Practice Makes Perfect Strangers

They got Capone for playing his C-melody too loud.
As a saxophone player, probably the most difficult thing about living in New York was finding a way to practice without pissing-off my neighbors. By necessity, most New Yorkers live stacked on top of one another, often in what are called “pre-war”(Spanish-American War, in some cases) tenement buildings, in tiny apartments separated by walls about as thick as a slice of Famous Ray’s. Peace and quiet is a relative thing at best, with the sound of traffic and all-night celebrations on the street outside your window a constant accompaniment (this being especially true when I lived in the East Village, which by the mid-90s was well on its way to becoming Yuppie Party Central). I always felt funny about adding my horn on top of the perpetual cacophony that is daily life in the city. I’d grown up in Oklahoma, where keepin’ quiet and stayin’ out of each others’ bidness was a way of life.
Consequently, I tended to practice in a sub-tone, or with a sock stuck in my bell. And that’s when I felt comfortable putting any air at all through the horn. More often, I’d simply work my fingers on the keys, the quiet pops of the pads substituting for the full-throated sound of a saxophone properly blown. My greatest fear was to bug some jazz-hating neighbor to the point where he’d complain to my landlord and I’d lose my lease. That would be bad. Even then, in the early 90s, there weren’t many $400 apartments to be had in Manhattan.

Not a building material.
Not every musician was so careful. Anyone who ever walked across the East Village on a hot summer day back then knows that. The sounds of invisible saxophonists wafted from open windows, one segueing into another as you walked around the neighborhood. When I lived on East 3rd Street between A & B, my next door neighbor was a trumpeter who had the unfortunate habit of coming home drunk at 3 o’clock in the morning to argue with his girlfriend and practice his horn (surely the two activities were related). Many a night I was jolted awake by angry shouts and the buzz of a Harmon mute inches from my ear, separated only by a wall that possessed all the sound-insulating properties of fresh mozzarella. Sometimes I’d bang on the wall. More often I’d let it slide. I could relate.
Now that I think of it, I wonder if maybe my switch to soprano from alto in 1989 was a response to the problem of volume when it came to practicing in the city. At that time I was living in a basement apartment in Astoria, beneath the house of a Croatian woman who lived with her two teenage daughters. I know that sounds like the setup to a dirty joke, but there was no hanky panky. They were really just very nice people. I definitely remember not wanting to disturb them with my playing. The main reason I switched was the fact that my alto was banged up and I couldn’t afford to give it the overhaul it needed. But a secondary reason might’ve been the fact that the soprano simply didn’t make as much noise.
My sound certainly suffered in my early years in the city, mostly because I felt inhibited from playing as strong as I would’ve liked. I recorded every note I played back then. Today I can’t listen to those tapes. My playing suffered from a paucity of sound that drives me crazy today. You perform the way you practice. I practiced wimpy. I was a wimp. I probably should’ve been flippin’ the bird to my neighbors all those years and practiced as loud and as often as I liked. Unfortunately for my sax playing, I never could shake my, um … excessively-considerate nature.
I got my best practicing done in Central Park. For eight years I worked a day gig at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. For a few of those years, when the weather was good, I’d bring my soprano to work and, on my lunch break, repair to a certain rock formation in the park behind the museum. I’d usually get a good half-hour, forty-five minutes in. I could play as loud as I like, bothering – and bothered by – nobody but the

Squirrel, by Franco Folini.
squirrels and rats scurrying in and out of the rocks and leaves … although on one occasion I got yelled at by a little old lady passing on a nearby path: “You stop that! You stop that noise!” I smiled and waved, pretending not to understand.
When I lived in the East Village, practicing wasn’t as big of an issue, simply because I was playing so much with other people – gigs sometimes, but mostly informal sessions, held at places like an old abandoned public school gymnasium (haunted, I swear), various decrepit storefronts and basements (when such places were cheap enough for musicians to rent as living spaces), and Context Studios on Avenue A (a dump that nevertheless provided passable rehearsal space at a decent price). My sound blossomed during that era. I was playing loud in the company of other musicians doing the same, and it was heavenly.
That said, there’s no substitute for intensive practicing, both in terms of sound production and technique, and that’s something I was only able to do after I left the city. In 1998, a few months after the birth of our first child, my wife and I moved to Mount Vernon, just outside NYC, where we rented an apartment in a building not unlike the one we’d just left on the Lower East Side, only somewhat larger. It was nice to have more room, but the neighbors were probably even more inclined to be disturbed by the free jazz-playing saxophonist living next door. As a consequence, things didn’t much improve, practice-wise. In fact, I stopped playing the horn altogether for a time, concentrating instead on creating weird music on a computer, which I could play as loud as my ears could stand, provided I used headphones. We lived there for three years. Most of that time, practicing wasn’t an issue. I didn’t play saxophone anymore.

We almost bought this nice place in Chappaqua next door to Hillary and Bill.
Things changed. In 2001 our second child was born. Additional living space was a necessity or at least highly desirable. My wife and I felt like, with two kids, we were no longer artsy Bohemians. We were grownups, and we should start acting the part. We decided to buy a house. Starting as near the city as possible, we began looking for something we could afford. First in lower Westchester County, where about the only things in our price range were caves dug out of the ground by homeless junkies emigrating from the Bronx, then gradually further upstate. We looked in upper Westchester, then Putnam County, before stumbling upon Pawling, a nice little village on the Metro North Harlem line, about an hour-and-a-half north of the city. A housing development was going up outside of town. The houses were pretty big and reasonably priced. We managed to get a loan and bought one.
It was the best thing we could’ve done, for the family, and for me as a musician. I’d never really kicked the saxophone habit. The attraction of being able to play my horn as loud and as often as I wanted – for the first time in my life, really – was too much to resist. Within a few months of moving into the house, I’d put my laptop aside and was playing my horn again. Soon, I was practicing every spare moment, between constant diaper-changings and trips to the pediatrician.
I put as much air through my soprano as it could take. When the soprano proved to be insufficiently powerful, I bought a tenor, then an alto. I found the perfect spot at the the top of the stairs, where blowing the horns at full volume seemed to vibrate the entire house to its foundation. Suddenly I recognized the virtues and discovered the techniques of Albert Ayler (“Oh, that’s how he did that!”). Not only did my sound get big, my chops got bigger, too. My playing evolved and improved more in the eight years after moving to Pawling than it did in any similar period in the previous 30 years. In my 40s, I finally became myself.
Looking back, I wonder how any acoustic musician really manages to reach his or her potential living in New York City, given the problems involved in simply being able to practice your instrument. I guess most people who do it are less inhibited than I am. Who knows? Maybe if I’d stayed in the city, I’d have lost my uptight-ness and began rattling the windows of my East 3rd Street apartment several hours a day, the way I now do in my house upstate. I didn’t do it in the 12 years I did live there, however, so there’s really no reason to believe it would’ve happened.
Anyway, all’s well that ends well. I now live in about as peaceful and as quiet a place as you can imagine … a place where I can play as loud and as long as I want, without bothering anybody. Ironic, right?
Even my Yellow Lab digs my playing. She follows me all over the house (I’m a peripatetic practicer), tail a’ wagging – always happy, no matter how hard and fast and loud I play. Turns out, I didn’t have to change my essential nature at all. I found a place where I can avoid bugging people (and animals, like those poor Central Park squirrels and rats), yet still enjoy the wonders of blowing with lungs fully extended.
Take that, little old lady in the park.


Giving an entirely new meaning to “stuff a sock in it”
Comment by Kerri — November 12, 2009 @ 11:23 amI much prefer “Practice Makes Perfect Strangers” to your ravenous Rottweiler rants against Ken Burns, Wynton Marsalis, JALC, Greg Osby, et al. Those come across as angry, resentful and unbecomingly envious. Whenever an active musician writes nasty things about his rivals, I’m inclined to ascribe base motives. Since there are so few musicians who can write even half as well as you, Chris, it’s disappointing when you fall into that trap. Thankfully, with today’s blog you give us non-musicians an engaging glimpse into one of the practical problems a musician must confront to master his craft. I especially appreciate how you avoid the off-putting pitfalls of technical discourse. Have you read Steve Coleman’s incomprehensible jazz.com piece on Charlie Parker? These 15K words of what Coleman calls “micro-information” might be appropriate for a master’s thesis, but who besides a few hundred musicians and teachers cares? “Regarding whether to use the name half-diminished or minor triad with the added 6th,” writes Coleman, “this is a case where a simple change in name can obscure the melodic and harmonic function of a particular sound. Dizzy Gillespie mentions this in his autobiography when he says that for him and his colleagues, there was no such thing as half-diminished chords; what is called a half-diminished chord today, they called a minor triad with a major sixth in the bass.” As Lester Young said to Sonny Stitt, who was showing off his technique on the band bus, “That’s all well and good, but can you sing me a song?” With today’s blog, Chris, you sang me a song.
Comment by Alan Kurtz — November 12, 2009 @ 5:00 pmMy main saxophonic experience in the Apple was in some vague 79/80 summer when I was helping Frank Wright run a record store on Carmine Street. A local mobster living behind us had a loud german shepherd that constantly barked, fucking with my sleep.
There was a horn laying around so I used the mouthpiece to make excruciating ultra sound squeals that are inaudible to humans but quite painful to canids. The dog would shut up instantly while the mobster was unawares. You just bite the reed and go to town.
So I found a way to make a sax part induce silence.
Back in the 70s when I actually made some foolish efforts to play an Alto, I couldn’t practice at home as it annoyed my ancient great grandmother but we had woods out back, but then it would attract kids like I was some pied piper.
I also tried playing on the town common on a day that was some hero’s real birthday or something and the local press came by to photo me just after I left as the hicks thought it was some ‘statement’.
My best practice spot was on these parapets of the Longfellow Bridge Turrets late at night in the middle of the Charles River between Cambridge and Boston. That was cool. No one gave a shit. I was a little hick wannabe Sonny Rollins clone. He used the more poetic Williamsburg Bridge.
Thank god I gave that thing away.
Comment by Chris Rich — November 12, 2009 @ 7:14 pmLol! I don’t know about how poetic the Williamsburg Bridge is, really. I think Sonny made it so.
There was this guy who used to play gigs downtown in the ‘90s whose entire concept was squealing as you describe. For some reason, he used his whole horn, but it was bite the reed all the time for him … he cleared the glue-sniffers off Rivington …
Comment by Chris — November 13, 2009 @ 11:53 amThanks for the kind words, Alan. I’m sorry my more rant-ish things strike you as examples of envy. It’s actually possible to believe the things done by Burns, JALC, Marsalis, Osby, etc. are injurious to the development and good health of jazz – as it is possible to find their music singularly unappealing – without being jealous. They have nothing I want, and I have everything I need.
Comment by Chris — November 13, 2009 @ 1:23 pm“They have nothing I want,” you write, “and I have everything I need.” That’s eloquent and impossible to debate. Even so, I want to clarify what I meant by envy. I wasn’t referring to the material success of Wynton Marsalis, although he’s had plenty. Rather, I was thinking of recognition. Most of us strive for that, whether we admit it or not. If you, like me, need greater recognition, then that’s something Wynton has and you want. Thus envy rears its ugly hindquarters. As for Wynton & Co. doing things that are, in your words, “injurious to the development and good health of jazz,” you recently proposed that we “quit talking about jazz as if it had a mailing address.” Yet you’re still criticizing JALC as if that were jazz’s permanent mail drop. Isn’t it possible to, again in your words, “find their music singularly unappealing” without demonizing them as a viral strain infecting a living organism?
Comment by Alan Kurtz — November 14, 2009 @ 2:32 pmHey Guys,.
I’m glad Chris goes there with JALC like he does.It’s keeping it real.There’s a real case to be made that Jazz has never been challenged to exist more so than today,.and standing up and speaking your mind in today’s day and age is a rarity.I’ve been going there myself at times at Brilliant Corners..
I do agree,.that nothing tops the creative avenue however,.it transcends all debate when you hit a home run in writing..
Great stories on to Practice,..or not to practice..
My own is playing in the closet,.with my horns buried in clothes,.for years in midtown.Way better was my spots along the river on the west side of NYC.I would take my bike and horns out there for many a Sunset,.the best practice of all..
Comment by matt Lavelle — November 14, 2009 @ 11:52 pmAlan, I think I’m going to leave this alone after this, except to say that “recognition” falls under the heading of “nothing I want,” or at least, “things to which I am largely indifferent.” Indeed, as far as that goes, I’d rather have money than fame, but I’m in the wrong business for that, aren’t I?
We’ve never met in person, and only know each other from these online encounters, so I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised that you ascribe sinister or selfish motives to my criticisms. I guess such skepticism is human nature. I would like to think my passion for the betterment of jazz speaks for itself, but apparently in your eyes it doesn’t. I must try harder, though one cannot satisfy everybody, that much is sure.
Comment by Chris — November 15, 2009 @ 10:40 amChris, you’re right to lose patience with me. In my cantankerous groping to understand, I can be a pest. Thanks for tolerating me as long as you did. I enjoyed the back & forth. Thanks also for letting us download ‘Not Cool,’ whose liner notes provide further insight into your philosophy. “I couldn’t embrace the music I loved,” you write of yourself 30 years ago, “without repudiating what I found appalling.” Apparently you still can’t, for your packaging of ‘Not Cool’ depends on repudiation. From your subtitle ( … as in, “The Opposite of Paul Desmond”) to slamming other white saxophonists whose limpid sound and sardonic style induce vomiting, you situate yourself as “a natural rebel,” someone who’d “say or play what I wanted, when I wanted, and to hell with the consequences.” This oafish approach, particularly combined with what in your preceding comment you call your “passion for the betterment of jazz,” is regrettably familiar. The Christian missionaries who charged off to the remotest corners of Africa, Asia, and the South Sea islands, were similarly armed with a passion for betterment and a brutish disregard for consequences, and their impact was disastrous. More recently Islamic Jihadists have shown the same self-righteous passion for the betterment of others whether the others want to be bettered or not. Count me out.
Comment by Alan Kurtz — November 15, 2009 @ 3:36 pm