The Colts’ Trane
I must’ve been the only person outside of Indianapolis who was rooting for the Colts in the Super Bowl. I was probably the only jazz musician anywhere rooting against the Saints, seein’ that they’re jazz’s official hometown team. Certainly I don’t begrudge New Orleansians their happiness. God knows they deserve it.
But as a guy for whom improvisation is a way of life, I especially admire Colts’ QB Peyton Manning, whose game I believe resembles jazz more than that of any other NFL quarterback. Whereas most quarterbacks have their plays called by a coach in the sideline or a pressbox-perched eye in the sky, Manning calls most of his own — plays are “suggested” by his offensive coordinator, but Manning has the final word. Of course, that’s not such a big deal, when you consider that back in the old days, all quarterbacks called their own plays. What makes Manning special is that he calls many of his own plays at the line of scrimmage after surveying the defensive alignment. In other words, he improvises a call on the spot, using an internalized language and vocabulary. Like a master jazz saxophonist who knows just what note or rhythm will fit a given set of circumstances, Manning has the extraordinary ability — a gift honed by intense practice — to make the best of all possible choices more often than not. It’s been estimated that Manning will change his original call at the line of scrimmage something like 96% of the time, making him a master of contingency on the level of a John Coltrane or Miles Davis.
Of course, it doesn’t always work, and like a Coltrane or Davis, his seat-of-the-pants ethos is liable to fail him on occasion. That happened yesterday, yet even on the heels of the interception that effectively ended his season, he kept after it, blowing with guts and guile right up to the last note. Hats off to the Saints, and all the best to New Orleans, but to me the guy on that field yesterday who best exemplifies the jazz aesthetic was the quarterback with the horseshoe logo on his helmet.


Not to pick apart your argument too much… but aren’t you taking this analogy a bit too far? Manning does indeed pick the right play for the circumstances, but the opposing team is trying to make him fail, whereas Coltrane’s sidemen were trying to help him succeed. Also, I think we can all agree that there are elements of improvisation in infinite arenas of modern life: sports, the workplace, relationships, etc. But there is more to jazz than improvisation. Jazz is a process of spontaneous creation, football is a game with winners and losers. Jazz musicians and athletes both improvise, but with vastly different goals in mind.
Comment by David — February 9, 2010 @ 8:33 amNo matter how much help I get from my sidemen, the changes to “Giant Steps” are definitely out to kick my butt …
Comment by Chris — February 9, 2010 @ 8:51 amTouché
Comment by David — February 9, 2010 @ 9:31 am